<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Grow up, Mashup!</title>
	<link>http://www.tomanthony.co.uk/blog/grow-up-mashup/</link>
	<description>Making sites that are easy to find, and easy to use.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 22:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Discount Codes</title>
		<link>http://www.tomanthony.co.uk/blog/grow-up-mashup/#comment-13643</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 12:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tomanthony.co.uk/blog/grow-up-mashup/#comment-13643</guid>
					<description>Im trying to create a mash-up for one of my sites. Any ideas on where I can get more info?
Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im trying to create a mash-up for one of my sites. Any ideas on where I can get more info?<br />
Cheers
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.tomanthony.co.uk/blog/grow-up-mashup/#comment-26</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 13:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tomanthony.co.uk/blog/grow-up-mashup/#comment-26</guid>
					<description>Chris - a good point about microformats, and core applications never being fully integrated. Every person has a different set of core applications, normally from multiple vendors, and microformats provide a brilliant method for them to communicate.

It is this exact sort of communication that could really be exploited as one of the ways to offer mashups that are integrated into our workflow (as well as other inter-application communications).

You (and I) are lucky to already be enjoying it to any degree, with your example regarding Safari and Address Book - it is an advantage of having many apps from the same vendor. I'm not sure what the situation on the PC is currently?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris - a good point about microformats, and core applications never being fully integrated. Every person has a different set of core applications, normally from multiple vendors, and microformats provide a brilliant method for them to communicate.</p>
<p>It is this exact sort of communication that could really be exploited as one of the ways to offer mashups that are integrated into our workflow (as well as other inter-application communications).</p>
<p>You (and I) are lucky to already be enjoying it to any degree, with your example regarding Safari and Address Book - it is an advantage of having many apps from the same vendor. I&#8217;m not sure what the situation on the PC is currently?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chris Korhonen</title>
		<link>http://www.tomanthony.co.uk/blog/grow-up-mashup/#comment-25</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 08:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tomanthony.co.uk/blog/grow-up-mashup/#comment-25</guid>
					<description>A good article, and one I'm in agreement with.... there may be a million and one mashups out there, but off the top of my head, I can't really think of one which I use!

Of course, the ones we all use are quite subtle... like for instance the embedded Google Map on website X, or the Flickr integration of website Y - that is the primary future which I see, API's being leveraged more and more to add functionality to websites (rather than API's being used to produce a completely new mashups). As you say, many of these API's solve specific problems and thats where we will see them being used. 

There is other value in Mashups - they let you compare wildly different data-sets, and sometimes they surprise you (Note to Yahoo: when are you going to be releasing Astronewsology? ;)), but sadly, unless it makes things much more useful, the web going majority probably won't bat an eyelid.

Interesting that you brought up microformats, as I was thinking the exact same thing. I don't see a situation where your all of the core applications on your desktop will be integrated, or mashed up togteher, but that is where I see microformats coming in. They are a bridge between applications. At the minute, I can click a button in Safari and all the hCards on a page are automagically imported into Address Book and they allow data to be defined at this semantic level, so that it can easilly be accessed. Of course the big challenge comes in getting more people to use them, but I can see microformats becoming something as big as RSS...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good article, and one I&#8217;m in agreement with&#8230;. there may be a million and one mashups out there, but off the top of my head, I can&#8217;t really think of one which I use!</p>
<p>Of course, the ones we all use are quite subtle&#8230; like for instance the embedded Google Map on website X, or the Flickr integration of website Y - that is the primary future which I see, API&#8217;s being leveraged more and more to add functionality to websites (rather than API&#8217;s being used to produce a completely new mashups). As you say, many of these API&#8217;s solve specific problems and thats where we will see them being used. </p>
<p>There is other value in Mashups - they let you compare wildly different data-sets, and sometimes they surprise you (Note to Yahoo: when are you going to be releasing Astronewsology? <img src='http://www.tomanthony.co.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> ), but sadly, unless it makes things much more useful, the web going majority probably won&#8217;t bat an eyelid.</p>
<p>Interesting that you brought up microformats, as I was thinking the exact same thing. I don&#8217;t see a situation where your all of the core applications on your desktop will be integrated, or mashed up togteher, but that is where I see microformats coming in. They are a bridge between applications. At the minute, I can click a button in Safari and all the hCards on a page are automagically imported into Address Book and they allow data to be defined at this semantic level, so that it can easilly be accessed. Of course the big challenge comes in getting more people to use them, but I can see microformats becoming something as big as RSS&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
